How does "Scanlon" differ from "Good Management"?
Douglas McGregor
"The Scanlon Plan constitutes a contribution to the art of management of first importance..."
Slichter, Healy and Livernash
"There is no unique opportunity in management; only the daily need to watch things run. There is no critical responsibility in management; only the requirement to make it to tomorrow.
Carl Frost
What is "Good Management"?
There is no universal definition of what constitutes "good management." Managers with extremely different styles and methods are often considered "good" in the business press. "Management" as an area of study is a fairly recent phenomena having been a part of business school curricula for less than 50 years.
However, that said, a consensus is starting to form that good management is both task- and people-focused. It involves a set of skills that enables an organization to achieve success (complete tasks) by maximizing the use of all resources including human resources.
To complicate the question further, there is a difference between "management" and "leadership." Leadership is about vision and helping people adapt and change. Some focus on Management and others on Leadership.
Scanlon as "Good Management"
When Joe Scanlon discovered the power of participation and cooperation, many did not consider it good management. In fact, early adopters of the philosophy were often ridiculed by other business managers. It is a tribute to Scanlon's genius that today many managers share information, involve employees, create equity systems and encourage continuous learning. More and more of the business world is finally coming to the conclusion that good management is Scanlon management.
Scanlon as "Leadership"
Scanlon Leaders like Carl Frost, John Donnelly, D.J. Hugh and Max DePree have contributed greatly to the development of Leadership theory. Leadership is an Art and Leadership Jazz are best selling Leadership books. They are about Scanlon Leadership or "servant leadership." Scanlon Leaders believe that leadership is an opportunity to serve others and to help others adapt and change. This is still a very rare concept of business and is a major difference between Scanlon organizations and more typical business organizations.
Scanlon as an "Open Source" Philosophy
Today computer software users are torn between two different software philosophies. Many users buy software from organizations like Microsoft where the source code is proprietary. Other users prefer "open-source" software where the software is essentially owned by the public. Anyone can contribute to the development of the open source software as long as certain basic rules are followed.
Scanlon is an open-source philosophy. Joe never copyrighted or trademarked his work. Other Gainsharing systems like Improshare are trademarked. Other Management systems are often developed and promoted by consultants. Scanlon philosophy is a collection of ideas created and refined by the users.
This means that Scanlon is more flexible and costs less to implement than most other management and leadership systems. It also means that there is no universal "Scanlon" but many variations. It means that Scanlon Consultants are not the owners of Scanlon, but valued resources to help implement a Scanlon process.
Scanlon as Philosophy and Systems
From the very beginning Scanlon has been a philosophy about both people and systems that enable the philosophy to succeed. Suggestion systems, adhoc committees, plans, equity structures, roadmap change processes, etc. are as much a part of Scanlon as is Theory Y and the Scanlon Principles. Very few other philosophies are as well developed as Scanlon and very few philosophies have effective systems linked to them like Scanlon. This is a major difference between Scanlon and "good management" and "good leadership."
Scanlon as Personal, Professional and Organizational Development
Scanlon encourages development on all three levels. No other management or leadership philosophy provides development on all three levels for all employees.
Scanlon has been tested, while most
Scanlon has been extensively researched. Many good management philosophies, for example, Stephen Covey's 7 Habits of Effective Leaders, have not faced the same research scrutiny. Many poor philosophies, like Reengineering, become hot topics only to be disproved over time. In study after study, independent researchers have documented the effectiveness of the Scanlon approach.
The Scanlon Leadership Network
Since most management and leadership systems are proprietary, users must pay large fees to learn the system and they are dependent on the owners of the system for support. Scanlon users created the Scanlon Leadership Network as a nonprofit association to provide support. The Network is member-led and within the limits of nonprofit law, member-owned. Members are able to pool resources to develop new products and services and are able to collect and share best practices. They are able to adapt and change the philosophy and systems as they see fit.
Some organizations are able on their own to develop and maintain excellent management and leadership systems. However, most business organizations lack the time and resources to do this. The Network allows an organization to create its own unique management and leadership system while "standing on the shoulders" of truly great business leaders. It provides a vehicle for excellent organizations to learn from other excellent organizations. The Network is a major difference between Scanlon and other management/leadership philosophies.
Questions to Ponder
In your mind, what is the difference between good management and Scanlon?
In your mind, what is good Leadership and how does it differ from Scanlon Leadership?
What resources do you use to improve your management and leadership skills?
How is the Network the same or different from other resources you use?